During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Майя Пономаренко
。业内人士推荐爱思助手下载最新版本作为进阶阅读
Что думаешь? Оцени!
Что думаешь? Оцени!。关于这个话题，下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。提供了深入分析
是的。小鹏在2月刚刚启动了L4级别道路测试。这款车本地算力3000TOPS，超过了刚刚宣发的理想新L9的2560TOPS。，更多细节参见夫子
适马方面表示，跨界农业是一项旨在维持当地生态景观的实质性举措。公司意图通过维护和开垦水稻田，创造稳定且传统的就业机会，从而完成从「单向受惠于土地资源」向「直接回馈地区生态」的企业角色转变。